Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Parker v British Airways Board

1982 · QB 1004

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
Mr Parker found a gold bracelet on the floor of an executive lounge at Heathrow. He handed it in. Nobody claimed it. The airline sold it and kept the money. He sued in .
Issue
Does the occupier of a building, or the finder, have the better right to a found on the floor?
Held
The finder won. The airline had not shown an intention to exercise control over things found on the floor.
Principle
A finder has a right against all but the true owner, unless the occupier had manifested an intention to control the building and the things in it before the finding.
Why it matters
It is the modern case on things found on land, beside City of London Corporation v Appleyard.

Words and Latin in this note

Chattel
A moveable thing. If it is not annexed to the land so as to become a fixture, it does not pass with the land. Open the note.

Also on Lanbuk

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.