
Lace v Chantler
1944 · KB 368
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- In 1940 a house was let 'for the duration of the war'. The landlord later served a as if the tenancy were periodic. The tenant said the letting was a term that had not ended.
- Issue
- Is a tenancy 'for the duration of the war' a valid lease?
- Held
- No. At the start, nobody could say when the war would end. The term was uncertain, so there was no lease for that period.
- Principle
- The maximum duration of a lease must be certain when the lease is granted.
- Why it matters
- It is the certainty case. A periodic tenancy is different, because each week or month is certain.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
