
Wheeler v Le Marchant
1881 · 17 Ch D 675
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Letters passed between a solicitor and a surveyor about a property. They were written so that the solicitor could advise the client. Litigation was not then contemplated. The other side sought the letters.
- Issue
- Are reports obtained from a third person privileged if they were obtained for advice, but not for litigation?
- Held
- No. Jessel MR held that communications with a third party are privileged only when they are made for the purpose of litigation that is pending or in contemplation. Advice privilege did not cover the surveyor.
- Principle
- A document from a surveyor, a doctor or an accountant is not privileged merely because a solicitor asked for it. The dominant purpose must be litigation, unless the communication is the client's own with the lawyer.
- Why it matters
- Waugh confirms the dominant-purpose test a century later. The two cases go together.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
