Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Thomas v David

1836 · 7 C & P 350

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
A witness denied that she was the mistress of the party who had called her. The other side had evidence that she was, and wanted to call it. The objection was that her answer on a question of credit was final.
Issue
May a denial of bias be contradicted by other evidence?
Held
Yes. Coleridge J allowed the rebuttal. A relationship that gives the witness a reason to favour one side is not a collateral matter. The jury may hear the evidence that contradicts the denial.
Principle
Bias is an exception to the rule that answers on credit are final.
Why it matters
Dunn v Aslet is a quarrel. Mendy is a witness spoken to outside court. Toohey is the separate exception for a mental or physical condition.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.