
R v Mendy
1976 · 64 Cr App R 4
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- During the trial the accused's husband was seen speaking to witnesses who were waiting outside court, and telling them what had been said in evidence. A witness denied that this had happened. The prosecution wanted to call the person who had seen it.
- Issue
- May the prosecution contradict a denial that a witness was briefed outside court?
- Held
- Yes. The Court of Appeal held that the incident was admissible. It went to whether the witness was giving an independent account or a prepared one.
- Principle
- Tampering, or briefing a witness about the evidence already given, is bias. A denial of it is not final.
- Why it matters
- It is the modern case beside the two nineteenth-century bias cases.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
