Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

R v Maqsud Ali

1966 · 1 QB 688

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
Maqsud Ali and Ashiq Hussein were suspected of murder. Police left them together in a room at Bradford Town Hall. A microphone, connected to a recorder in another room, taped what they said. The recording contained admissions. They said a secret recording should not be admitted.
Issue
Is a secret tape of a conversation between suspects admissible?
Held
Yes. The Court of Criminal Appeal admitted it. The judgment observes that criminals do not conduct their affairs according to the Queensberry rules, and that the eavesdropper, here a microphone, is a familiar means of detection.
Principle
A relevant recording is admissible though the speakers did not know they were being recorded.
Why it matters
Bailey is the case of a bug in a police cell. Khan is a listening device in a third person's home. All three were admitted.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.