
R v Maqsud Ali
1966 · 1 QB 688
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Maqsud Ali and Ashiq Hussein were suspected of murder. Police left them together in a room at Bradford Town Hall. A microphone, connected to a recorder in another room, taped what they said. The recording contained admissions. They said a secret recording should not be admitted.
- Issue
- Is a secret tape of a conversation between suspects admissible?
- Held
- Yes. The Court of Criminal Appeal admitted it. The judgment observes that criminals do not conduct their affairs according to the Queensberry rules, and that the eavesdropper, here a microphone, is a familiar means of detection.
- Principle
- A relevant recording is admissible though the speakers did not know they were being recorded.
- Why it matters
- Bailey is the case of a bug in a police cell. Khan is a listening device in a third person's home. All three were admitted.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
