
R v Fenlon
1980 · 71 Cr App R 307
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A party who does not cross-examine a witness on a material part of the evidence is taken to accept it.
- Issue
- What is the consequence of not putting your case to the other side's witness?
- Held
- The point is treated as not disputed. Counsel who wants to contradict a witness must put the contradiction in cross-examination, so that the witness has a chance to answer it.
- Principle
- Failure to cross-examine is acceptance. It is not a licence to ambush the witness in a closing speech.
- Why it matters
- There is an ethical limit as well. Do not cross-examine if you have nothing to challenge, and do not challenge a fact you know is true.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
