
Winzar v Chief Constable of Kent
1983 · The Times, 28 March 1983
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Winzar was drunk in a hospital corridor. The police were asked to remove him. They put him in a police car on the highway and then charged him with being found drunk on the highway.
- Issue
- Is he guilty if the police put him on the highway?
- Held
- Yes. It was immaterial that his presence on the highway was not his own act.
- Principle
- Being found in a forbidden condition can be proved without a voluntary act of going there.
- Why it matters
- Read it against Martin v State, where the American court required a voluntary appearance.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
