Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

United States v Holmes

1842 · 26 F Cas 360

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
After a shipwreck, an overcrowded boat was in danger. Holmes, a member of the crew, helped to throw sixteen male passengers into the sea. A grand jury refused to indict for murder. He was tried for manslaughter. Lots were not drawn. No seaman was sacrificed.
Issue
Can necessity, or the drawing of lots, justify throwing passengers from a boat?
Held
The jury was directed that passengers should be preferred to seamen, that only enough seamen to work the boat should be saved, and that the victims should be chosen by lot. Those conditions were not met. He was .
Principle
Even the American direction, which Dudley later disapproved, required a fair method of selection. A choice made by the crew was not fair.
Why it matters
Dudley treats the lots direction as wrong. The case remains the factual contrast.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.