
United States v Holmes
1842 · 26 F Cas 360
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- After a shipwreck, an overcrowded boat was in danger. Holmes, a member of the crew, helped to throw sixteen male passengers into the sea. A grand jury refused to indict for murder. He was tried for manslaughter. Lots were not drawn. No seaman was sacrificed.
- Issue
- Can necessity, or the drawing of lots, justify throwing passengers from a boat?
- Held
- The jury was directed that passengers should be preferred to seamen, that only enough seamen to work the boat should be saved, and that the victims should be chosen by lot. Those conditions were not met. He was .
- Principle
- Even the American direction, which Dudley later disapproved, required a fair method of selection. A choice made by the crew was not fair.
- Why it matters
- Dudley treats the lots direction as wrong. The case remains the factual contrast.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
