
R v Pittwood
1902 · 19 TLR 37
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Pittwood was employed to keep a railway-crossing gate shut. He opened it for a cart, went to lunch, and forgot to close it. A train hit a hay cart. One man was killed and another was seriously injured.
- Issue
- Can a duty in a contract found a manslaughter for an omission?
- Held
- Yes. He was convicted. Wright J said the was gross and criminal, because he was paid to keep the gate shut and protect the public.
- Principle
- A contractual duty owed to the public can be the duty that makes an omission criminal.
- Why it matters
- It is the contract case in the four duties to act.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
