
R v Nedrick
1986 · 1 WLR 1025
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Nedrick poured paraffin through the letterbox of a house and set light to it. A child died in the fire. He said he did not want anyone to die.
- Issue
- How should a jury be directed where intention is to be found from foresight?
- Held
- Lord Lane said the jury should ask how probable the consequence was, and whether the foresaw it. The direction that followed became the direction.
- Principle
- Where intention is not direct, the jury looks for foresight of a virtual certainty, not of a likely result.
- Why it matters
- Woollin approved this direction and rejected a direction in terms of substantial risk.
Words and Latin in this note
- Oblique intention
- A result the accused does not want, but foresees as a virtual certainty, and goes on to cause. Foresight of a merely probable result is not intention. Open the note.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
