
R v Franklin
1883 · 15 Cox CC 163
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Franklin took a box from a refreshment stall on Brighton pier and threw it into the sea. It struck and killed a swimmer. He was for manslaughter.
- Issue
- Is a civil wrong, without a crime, enough for constructive manslaughter?
- Held
- Field J refused to let the case go on that basis. A mere civil wrong against another person ought not to be the foundation of a criminal charge of this kind.
- Principle
- The unlawful act must be a crime, not only a .
- Why it matters
- Larkin and Church assume an act that is already criminal, such as an .
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
