
F v West Berkshire Health Authority
1990 · 2 AC 1
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- F was an adult woman with a serious mental disability. She had formed a sexual relationship. Doctors considered that pregnancy would be disastrous for her mental health. She could not consent to sterilisation. The hospital sought a declaration.
- Issue
- Can treatment be given, without consent, on the ground of necessity?
- Held
- Yes. Lord Goff founded the decision on necessity. The treatment had to be in the best interests of a person who could not decide.
- Principle
- Necessity can justify medical treatment of a person who lacks capacity, where the treatment is in that person's interests.
- Why it matters
- It is the third, controversial, category of necessity: an act done for a person who cannot consent.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
