
B v R
1960 · 44 Cr App R 1
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A child of eight was charged with house-breaking and larceny. He made a full confession. He was . He appealed on the ground that a child of that age should not have been found to have a guilty mind.
- Issue
- Can the presumption of incapacity be rebutted in a young child?
- Held
- The appeal was dismissed. The presumption is rebuttable, and on these facts it had been rebutted.
- Principle
- Age between seven and fourteen raises a presumption, not a bar. Strong evidence, including what the child says and does, can displace it.
- Why it matters
- Under seven the presumption cannot be rebutted at all.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
