In simple terms
More than one person may be liable for a single crime. The received common law distinguishes the principal who commits the act, those who aid and abet at the scene, those who counsel or procure beforehand, and those who help the offender afterwards.
Principals
Principal in the first degree: The person who does the act, including through an innocent agent such as a child or a person deceived.
Principal in the second degree: A person present who aids or abets. Mere presence is not enough; there must be encouragement or assistance with knowledge of the crime. Turay v R held that presence with consent and a common purpose can amount to encouragement (applying R v Coney and Wilcox v Jeffery).
Shouted encouragement: In Walker v R, people who urged the killer to stab the victim again were guilty of murder as principals in the second degree.
Soliciting while present: In John and Four Others v The State, one who solicited the robbery and was present was a principal.
Accessories
Accessory before the fact: One who counsels, procures or commands the crime but is absent when it is done. Kargbo v R (CA) stressed that the prosecution must prove absence and counselling or procuring; it is wrong to tell a jury that accused persons must "account for" a victim.
Accessory after the fact: One who, knowing a felony has been committed, helps the felon to avoid arrest or punishment.
Common purpose
Joint enterprise: Where two or more set out on a common unlawful purpose, each is liable for acts done in carrying it out, but not for acts outside its scope.
Memory map
Parties to crime
Principals
- Principal in the first degree
- Principal in the second degree
- Shouted encouragement
- Soliciting while present
Accessories
- Accessory before the fact
- Accessory after the fact
Common purpose
- Joint enterprise
Key points
- Principal in the first degree does the act
- Presence alone is not aiding
- Encouraging words can make a bystander a…
- An accessory before the fact counsels or…
Cases
- Turay v R
- Walker v R
- John and Four Others v The State
- Kargbo v R (accessory before the…
Take-home points
- Principal in the first degree does the act; in the second degree aids or abets at the scene.
- Presence alone is not aiding; there must be encouragement or help: Turay v R.
- Encouraging words can make a bystander a principal in murder: Walker v R.
- An accessory before the fact counsels or procures and is absent.
- An accessory after the fact knowingly helps the offender escape justice.
Cases in this topic
Related case law
Full judgments on Lanbuk on the same areas of law.
See also
- Turay v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 142 · Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
- Walker v R, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 189 · Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
- John and Four Others v The State · Lanbuk on the Law of Crimes in Sierra Leone · ALR (S.L.) 441 (1972-73), Court of Appeal of Sierra Leone
- Kargbo v R, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 146 · Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Lecture notes on this subject
No other Lanbuk notes on this module yet. Browse the law notes.
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Equity and trusts
Exam preparation
Family law
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law

