
Turay v R
1960s · ALR (S.L.) 142 (1964-66)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A young child was killed in a ritual killing. Some accused were present at the scene but did not strike the fatal blows.
- Issue
- Were those present liable as principals in the second degree?
- Held
- Yes. Their presence, with consent and a common purpose, encouraged the killer.
- Principle
- Presence alone is not aiding and abetting, but presence plus encouragement or shared purpose is (R v Coney; Wilcox v Jeffery).
- Why it matters
- Explains when bystanders become parties.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
