Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Turay v R

1960s · ALR (S.L.) 142 (1964-66)

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
A young child was killed in a ritual killing. Some accused were present at the scene but did not strike the fatal blows.
Issue
Were those present liable as principals in the second degree?
Held
Yes. Their presence, with consent and a common purpose, encouraged the killer.
Principle
Presence alone is not aiding and abetting, but presence plus encouragement or shared purpose is (R v Coney; Wilcox v Jeffery).
Why it matters
Explains when bystanders become parties.
Read the full judgment

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.