Williams v R
1957-60 · ALR (S.L.) 135 (1957-60)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The was of carnal knowledge of a girl under 13. The evidence relied on was the mother's report of her daughter's complaint and medical evidence that intercourse had occurred.
- Issue
- Was there implicating the accused?
- Held
- No. The complaint was not independent, and the medical evidence did not implicate the appellant. The conviction was quashed.
- Principle
- Corroboration must be independent evidence that implicates the accused in a material particular (see also George v R, ALR (S.L.) 336 (1968-69)).
- Why it matters
- The old corroboration rule in sexual cases; now read with the Sexual Offences Act 2012.
Words and Latin in this note
- Corroboration
- Independent evidence that confirms a witness in a material particular and implicates the accused. One witness is enough for most charges. Some offences fail without corroboration, and some witnesses call only for a warning. Open the note.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.