
Schawel v Reade
1913 · 2 IR 81
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The buyer of a horse was about to examine it. The seller told him not to look, the horse was perfectly sound, and any fault would have been disclosed. The buyer bought without examining.
- Issue
- Was that a warranty?
- Held
- Yes. The House of Lords held the statement was a term.
- Principle
- A statement that stops the other party making their own check is readily held to be a warranty.
- Why it matters
- it as the horse case beside Bannerman v White.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
