
Bannerman v White
1861 · 10 CB NS 844
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A buyer of hops said he would not ask the price if sulphur had been used. The seller said it had not. It had been used on a small part of the crop.
- Issue
- Was the assurance a term or a mere representation?
- Held
- It was a term. The seller knew the buyer would not contract if sulphur had been used.
- Principle
- A statement made to meet a stated condition of contracting is a term of the contract.
- Why it matters
- Importance to the buyer, known to the seller, points to a term.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
