
R v Smith
1900 · (1900) 17 SC 561 (Cape Colony)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- During the South African War a soldier shot and killed a local man on his officer's order.
- Issue
- Was obedience to superior orders a defence to murder?
- Held
- The soldier was . The order was not so plainly illegal that he must have known it was unlawful.
- Principle
- Solomon J: a soldier who honestly believes he is doing his duty in obeying an order is protected unless the order is so manifestly illegal that he must or ought to have known it was unlawful.
- Why it matters
- A classic statement on superior orders, now narrowed by international law.
Also on Lanbuk
- R v Smith (Stanley) in Lanbuk on the Law of Evidence
- R v Smith in Lanbuk on Criminal Law
- R v Smith (David) in Lanbuk on Criminal Law
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
