
R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham
1997 · [1998] QB 575
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- New rules removed the exemption from court fees for people on income support, so a poor man could not afford to bring a claim.
- Issue
- Could the Lord Chancellor, under a general power to set fees, effectively bar poor people from the courts?
- Held
- No. The rule was unlawful. Laws J held that access to the courts is a constitutional right at common law, which can only be taken away by clear statutory words.
- Principle
- General words in a statute do not authorise interference with fundamental rights such as access to justice.
- Why it matters
- An example of rights protected by the ordinary law, as Dicey described.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
