Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

R v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham

1997 · [1998] QB 575

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
New rules removed the exemption from court fees for people on income support, so a poor man could not afford to bring a claim.
Issue
Could the Lord Chancellor, under a general power to set fees, effectively bar poor people from the courts?
Held
No. The rule was unlawful. Laws J held that access to the courts is a constitutional right at common law, which can only be taken away by clear statutory words.
Principle
General words in a statute do not authorise interference with fundamental rights such as access to justice.
Why it matters
An example of rights protected by the ordinary law, as Dicey described.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.