
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bugdaycay
1986 · [1987] AC 514
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Asylum seekers challenged decisions to remove them, one to a country from which he feared he would be sent on to danger.
- Issue
- How closely should the courts examine decisions that put life at risk?
- Held
- One decision was quashed because the minister had not properly considered the risk.
- Principle
- Lord Bridge: the right to life is the most fundamental of all human rights, and decisions that may put it at risk call for the most anxious scrutiny.
- Why it matters
- Quoted on the right to life and the intensity of review.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
