
Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (Spycatcher)
1988 · [1990] 1 AC 109
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A former security service officer wrote a memoir about his work. It was published abroad. The government sought permanent against newspapers.
- Issue
- Should the injunctions continue once the book was freely available worldwide?
- Held
- No. The author owed a lifelong duty of confidence, but the information was now in the public domain, so the injunctions against the newspapers were refused.
- Principle
- Confidence may justify restricting expression, but not where the information is already public and no further harm can be prevented.
- Why it matters
- Shows how freedom of expression is balanced against confidentiality and national security.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
