
Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd
1920 · [1920] AC 508
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- In the First World War the Crown took over a hotel for military use and refused to pay compensation as of right, relying on the prerogative.
- Issue
- Could the Crown rely on the prerogative where a statute covered the same ground and provided compensation?
- Held
- No. Where a statute covers the same field, the prerogative is displaced, and the owner was entitled to compensation under the statute.
- Principle
- Statute displaces the prerogative in the same field.
- Why it matters
- Relevant to compulsory acquisition and compensation under section 21.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
