Skip to content

5. Pre-incorporation contracts

Who is bound before the company exists

Posted By lanbuk.com

In simple terms

A often needs to make contracts before the company is formed. At common law the company could never be bound, because it did not exist. The Act now lets the company adopt these contracts.

The common law problem

A company cannot contract before it exists. At common law it also cannot ratify a contract made before it existed, because ratification needs a principal who was in existence when the contract was made.

Personal liability of the promoter: in Kelner v Baxter the promoters signed a contract to buy wine on behalf of a proposed hotel company. The company was formed and the wine was used, but the company failed before paying. The court held that the promoters were personally liable on the contract, and that the company could not ratify it.

No contract at all: in Newborne v Sensolid the contract was signed in the name of a company that did not yet exist, with Newborne's name added to authenticate the company's signature. The Court of Appeal held there was no contract, so Newborne could not enforce it in his own name.

These results turned on fine points of wording, which was unsatisfactory.

The statutory rule

Section 59 of the Act deals with the problem directly.

Ratification: any contract made by or on behalf of the company before its formation may be ratified by the company after it is formed. The company then becomes bound by the contract and entitled to its benefit as if it had existed and been a party at the date of the contract.

Personal liability until ratification: until the company ratifies, the person who acted in its name or on its behalf is personally bound by the contract and entitled to its benefit, unless there is an express agreement to the contrary.

So in Sierra Leone the Kelner v Baxter and Newborne v Sensolid problems are largely solved. The person who acted is liable, and can enforce the contract, unless he expressly agreed otherwise, and the company can take over the contract by ratifying it.

A clear agreement is needed: in England a similar statutory rule was applied in Phonogram v Lane. The Court of Appeal held that an agreement excluding personal liability must be clear, and is not shown just by signing 'for and on behalf of' the company.

Words and Latin in this note

Promoter
A person who undertakes to form a company for a project and takes the steps to set it going. Under section 50 of the Companies Act 2009 a promoter is a fiduciary and must not make an undisclosed profit. Open the note.

Memory map

Pre-incorporation contracts

The common law problem

  • Personal liability of the promoter
  • No contract at all

The statutory rule

  • Ratification
  • Personal liability until ratification
  • A clear agreement is needed

Key points

  • At common law a company cannot ratify a…
  • Kelner v Baxter
  • Newborne v Sensolid
  • Section 59

Cases

  • Kelner v Baxter
  • Newborne v Sensolid (Great…
  • Phonogram Ltd v Lane

Key terms

  • Promoter

Take-home points

  • At common law a company cannot ratify a contract made before it existed.
  • Kelner v Baxter: the promoters who signed for an unformed company were personally liable.
  • Newborne v Sensolid: a contract signed in the name of a company that did not yet exist was a nullity.
  • Section 59: the company may ratify after formation, and until then the person who acted is personally bound unless expressly agreed otherwise.
  • Phonogram v Lane: signing for the company is not an agreement excluding personal liability.

Cases in this topic

See also

No other Lanbuk notes on this module yet. Browse the law notes.

Other law notes by subject

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.

Cite this page

'Pre-incorporation contracts, Lanbuk on the Law of Companies' (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/company-law/pre-incorporation-contracts> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.