In simple terms
A often needs to make contracts before the company is formed. At common law the company could never be bound, because it did not exist. The Act now lets the company adopt these contracts.
The common law problem
A company cannot contract before it exists. At common law it also cannot ratify a contract made before it existed, because ratification needs a principal who was in existence when the contract was made.
Personal liability of the promoter: in Kelner v Baxter the promoters signed a contract to buy wine on behalf of a proposed hotel company. The company was formed and the wine was used, but the company failed before paying. The court held that the promoters were personally liable on the contract, and that the company could not ratify it.
No contract at all: in Newborne v Sensolid the contract was signed in the name of a company that did not yet exist, with Newborne's name added to authenticate the company's signature. The Court of Appeal held there was no contract, so Newborne could not enforce it in his own name.
These results turned on fine points of wording, which was unsatisfactory.
The statutory rule
Section 59 of the Act deals with the problem directly.
Ratification: any contract made by or on behalf of the company before its formation may be ratified by the company after it is formed. The company then becomes bound by the contract and entitled to its benefit as if it had existed and been a party at the date of the contract.
Personal liability until ratification: until the company ratifies, the person who acted in its name or on its behalf is personally bound by the contract and entitled to its benefit, unless there is an express agreement to the contrary.
So in Sierra Leone the Kelner v Baxter and Newborne v Sensolid problems are largely solved. The person who acted is liable, and can enforce the contract, unless he expressly agreed otherwise, and the company can take over the contract by ratifying it.
A clear agreement is needed: in England a similar statutory rule was applied in Phonogram v Lane. The Court of Appeal held that an agreement excluding personal liability must be clear, and is not shown just by signing 'for and on behalf of' the company.
Words and Latin in this note
- Promoter
- A person who undertakes to form a company for a project and takes the steps to set it going. Under section 50 of the Companies Act 2009 a promoter is a fiduciary and must not make an undisclosed profit. Open the note.
Memory map
Pre-incorporation contracts
The common law problem
- Personal liability of the promoter
- No contract at all
The statutory rule
- Ratification
- Personal liability until ratification
- A clear agreement is needed
Key points
- At common law a company cannot ratify a…
- Kelner v Baxter
- Newborne v Sensolid
- Section 59
Cases
- Kelner v Baxter
- Newborne v Sensolid (Great…
- Phonogram Ltd v Lane
Key terms
- Promoter
Take-home points
- At common law a company cannot ratify a contract made before it existed.
- Kelner v Baxter: the promoters who signed for an unformed company were personally liable.
- Newborne v Sensolid: a contract signed in the name of a company that did not yet exist was a nullity.
- Section 59: the company may ratify after formation, and until then the person who acted is personally bound unless expressly agreed otherwise.
- Phonogram v Lane: signing for the company is not an agreement excluding personal liability.
Cases in this topic
See also
- Kelner v Baxter · Lanbuk on the Law of Companies · (1866) LR 2 CP 174
Lecture notes on this subject
No other Lanbuk notes on this module yet. Browse the law notes.
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Equity and trusts
Exam preparation
Family law
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law

