
Newborne v Sensolid (Great Britain) Ltd
1953 · [1954] 1 QB 45 (CA)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A contract to sell tinned ham was signed 'Leopold Newborne (London) Ltd', with Newborne's name underneath. The company had not yet been registered. The buyer refused to take the goods.
- Issue
- Could Newborne enforce the contract personally?
- Held
- No. The contract was made by the company, which did not exist, so there was no contract. Newborne had signed only to authenticate the company's signature.
- Principle
- A contract signed in the name of a company that does not exist may be a nullity.
- Why it matters
- Section 59 of the Act now makes the person who acted bound and entitled until ratification.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
