
Sheppard & Cooper Ltd v TSB Bank plc
1996 · [1996] 2 All ER 654
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The case is the authority the lecture cites for acceleration after a demand. The lecture spells the claimant Shepherd and states a one-hour delay and a sum of £600,000 as if they were the holding. Those details are not repeated here.
- Issue
- How soon may a lender treat a borrower as in default after a demand for payment?
- Held
- A proper demand must be followed by a reasonable opportunity to pay. What is reasonable depends on the circumstances, including banking hours. The borrower does not receive a long extra period in which to raise the money.
- Principle
- Bank of Baroda v Panessar is the companion case. The chance is to carry out the payment, not to find new finance. A lecture that says the bank need give no time at all overstates the case.
- Why it matters
- Cite Sheppard, spelled correctly, for the demand principle. Do not cite the slide's hour or its figure.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
