
Sam-Sumana v Attorney-General & Victor Bockarie Foh
2015 · (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1203
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The President relieved the Vice-President of his office after his party expelled him, and appointed a new Vice-President. The former Vice-President brought an action in the Supreme Court's original under sections 124 and 127 of the Constitution.
- Issue
- Could the President remove the Vice-President other than by the impeachment procedure in sections 50 and 51 of the Constitution?
- Held
- The Supreme Court upheld the removal and the new appointment. In 2017 the ECOWAS Court of Justice, in a separate action, held that the removal violated his rights and ordered compensation.
- Principle
- Questions on the interpretation of the Constitution go to the Supreme Court in its exclusive original jurisdiction.
- Why it matters
- A leading example of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, and of the interaction between national courts and the ECOWAS Court.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
