
R v Greater Manchester Coroner, ex parte Tal
1984 · [1985] QB 67 (DC)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The Divisional Court had to decide whether it was bound by its own previous decisions when exercising supervisory .
- Issue
- Is the Divisional Court bound by its own earlier decisions?
- Held
- In its supervisory jurisdiction the Divisional Court would normally follow its earlier decisions, but could depart from them if satisfied they were wrong, on principles like those in Young v Bristol Aeroplane.
- Principle
- Courts of first instance and supervisory courts have a degree of flexibility over their own decisions.
- Why it matters
- Illustrates how operates at the level of the High Court.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
