In simple terms
Sierra Leone does not have one family law. It has three, and two kinds of court. The first question in almost every problem is which marriage this is, and which court can hear it.
Family law here is the law of marriage, of the relationship that marriage creates, of parent and child, and of what happens to property when a person dies. Smart's account, written about 1973, is still the map. The statutes of 2007, 2009 and 2024 have redrawn parts of it. They have not replaced the map.
There are three systems. The general law is the common law, equity, and the enactments in force. For marriage that means, above all, the Christian Marriage Act (Cap. 95), the Civil Marriage Act (Cap. 97), and the Matrimonial Causes Act (Cap. 102). A marriage under Cap. 95 or Cap. 97 is monogamous. The Mohammedan Marriage Act (Cap. 96) does not itself set out a code of Muslim marriage. It recognises a marriage that is valid by Mohammedan law, between persons who profess that faith, as valid for civil purposes, and it lets the courts receive proof of that marriage and of its dissolution. Customary law is the third system. It is not one code. It is the current law of the chiefdom that applies to the parties, so far as it is not repugnant to , equity and good conscience, and not incompatible with an enactment that applies to the Provinces.
Two court systems apply them. The High Court and the magistrates apply the general law. A Local Court in the Provinces applies customary law, and the general law only where customary law has no rule for the transaction. Section 21 of the Courts Act 1965 takes away the High Court's original to establish the existence or dissolution of a marriage governed by customary law, or to try a claim founded on such a marriage. A customary marriage is not, for that reason, legally invisible. A general-law court can still recognise it when a statute, or the justice of the case, requires recognition. It cannot dissolve it.
The received English law is not whatever English law is today. Section 74 of the Courts Act 1965 receives the common law, the doctrines of equity, and the statutes of general application in force in England on 1 January 1880. Later English statutes do not apply unless Sierra Leone has adopted them. Later English decisions are in fact cited, especially on cruelty, and non-consummation, because the Matrimonial Causes Act was copied from the English Act of 1950, with one important omission: insanity is not a ground for divorce here.
Hyde v Hyde is the sentence that still organises the general-law courts. Marriage, for the matrimonial remedies of those courts, is the voluntary union for life of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others. A customary marriage, which may be polygamous, is a marriage. It is not a marriage to which those remedies attach. Baindail is the other half. A potentially polygamous marriage is nonetheless a marriage, so that a later monogamous ceremony with someone else is bigamous.
Words and Latin in this note
- Natural justice
- Two rules of fair procedure: no one should be a judge in his own cause, and each side must be heard. Open the note.
- Desertion
- In a Christian or civil marriage, a separation for a continuous three years, with an intention to end cohabitation permanently, without the other spouse's consent, and without just cause. Constructive desertion is conduct grave enough to drive the other spouse out. Open the note.
Memory map
Three systems, two courts
Key points
- Ask first which marriage it is
- The High Court does not dissolve a customary…
- English statutes after 1 January 1880 are not…
Cases
- Hyde v Hyde
- Baindail v Baindail
Key terms
- Desertion
- Natural justice
Take-home points
- Ask first which marriage it is: Christian, civil, Mohammedan, or customary. The remedy follows the marriage.
- The High Court does not dissolve a customary marriage. A Local Court does not try a petition under the Matrimonial Causes Act.
- English statutes after 1 January 1880 are not Sierra Leone law unless they have been adopted. The Matrimonial Causes Act is a local Act, copied from the English Act, without insanity as a ground.
Cases in this topic
Related case law
Full judgments on Lanbuk on the same areas of law.
- Lahm v Lahm, 1970-71 ALR S.L. 27Sierra Leone
- Jalloh v R, 1957-60 ALR S.L. 1Sierra Leone
See also
- Hyde v Hyde · Lanbuk on the Law of the Family · (1866) LR 1 P&D 130
Lecture notes on this subject
- Application of Islamic Law in Sierra LeoneFamily law
- Valid Divorce under Muslim Law in Sierra Leone: Requirements and ProcedureFamily law
- Divorce Petition: Specimen FormFamily law
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Equity and trusts
Exam preparation
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law

