Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Wellesley-Cole v Wellesley-Cole

1968 · 1967-68 ALR SL 210

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
A cruelty petition. At first instance Beoku-Betts J applied the . The Court of Appeal was asked what 'satisfied' in the Matrimonial Causes Act requires.
Issue
What is the standard of proof of cruelty?
Held
Sir Samuel Bankole Jones P rejected the balance of probabilities. The standard is higher than the civil standard, and not as high as the criminal standard.
Principle
Because the Act requires the court to be satisfied, a cruelty case is not decided as an ordinary civil claim. The standard the Court of Appeal stated sits between the two.
Why it matters
State the holding, and then the criticism. Bucknill LJ in Bater v Bater, on which the President relied, had accepted the criminal standard. An intermediate standard is difficult to apply evenly. Adultery, by contrast, stays at the Ginesi standard.
Read the full judgment

Words and Latin in this note

Balance of probabilities
The standard of proof in civil cases, and the standard when an accused bears a legal burden: the court asks whether something is more likely than not to have happened. Open the note.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.