
Wellesley-Cole v Wellesley-Cole
1968 · 1967-68 ALR SL 210
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A cruelty petition. At first instance Beoku-Betts J applied the . The Court of Appeal was asked what 'satisfied' in the Matrimonial Causes Act requires.
- Issue
- What is the standard of proof of cruelty?
- Held
- Sir Samuel Bankole Jones P rejected the balance of probabilities. The standard is higher than the civil standard, and not as high as the criminal standard.
- Principle
- Because the Act requires the court to be satisfied, a cruelty case is not decided as an ordinary civil claim. The standard the Court of Appeal stated sits between the two.
- Why it matters
- State the holding, and then the criticism. Bucknill LJ in Bater v Bater, on which the President relied, had accepted the criminal standard. An intermediate standard is difficult to apply evenly. Adultery, by contrast, stays at the Ginesi standard.
Words and Latin in this note
- Balance of probabilities
- The standard of proof in civil cases, and the standard when an accused bears a legal burden: the court asks whether something is more likely than not to have happened. Open the note.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
