
Churchman v Churchman
1945 · [1945] P 44
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A divorce petition in which the said the petitioner had at the adultery.
- Issue
- What is connivance?
- Held
- Lord Merriman P described connivance as a willing consent to the adultery. Passive acquiescence with knowledge can be enough. A mere failure to prevent every opportunity is not.
- Principle
- Connivance is an absolute bar. A spouse who consents to the adultery cannot then complain of it.
- Why it matters
- Smart uses it for the trap case: if the trap is what causes the adultery, the petitioner may have consented to the offence he then proves.
Words and Latin in this note
- Connivance
- A willing consent to the adultery complained of. It is an absolute bar. Failing to prevent every opportunity is not enough. A trap that causes the adultery may be. Open the note.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
