
Baxter v Baxter
1948 · [1948] AC 274
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The parties had sexual intercourse, but contraceptives were used, and one spouse said the marriage had never been consummated.
- Issue
- Does consummation require the possibility of conception?
- Held
- No. Consummation is ordinary and complete intercourse. The use of contraceptives does not prevent it.
- Principle
- Wilful refusal and incapacity are about intercourse, not about children. A just excuse, such as illness, negatives wilful refusal. Malingering does not.
- Why it matters
- The Sierra Leone courts use this learning on nullity. Insanity is not a ground of divorce, but incapacity to consummate is a ground of nullity.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
