
Bamgbose v Daniel
1955 · [1955] AC 107
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Children of a valid polygamous marriage claimed on an intestacy under a statute that spoke of children, and it was said that only children of a monogamous marriage could qualify.
- Issue
- Are children of a polygamous marriage 'children'?
- Held
- The Privy Council held that they are.
- Principle
- A valid polygamous marriage produces legitimate children. A statute is not read as excluding them unless it says so.
- Why it matters
- The answer to any argument that a customary or Muslim child is a stranger to a modern succession statute. The 2007 Act now says the same thing in its definition of child and of marriage.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
