
Anoff v Fofanah
1967 · 1967-68 ALR SL 357
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A dispute between parents over the custody of their child, each asserting a superior right.
- Issue
- Does either parent have an absolute right to custody?
- Held
- Dobbs J held that the welfare of the child is paramount, but not exclusive. The mother's wishes prevail against the father's if the child's welfare is not impaired by giving effect to them.
- Principle
- No parent has an absolute claim. Welfare decides, and a parent's wishes are relevant only through the child's interests.
- Why it matters
- The local custody case. The Child Rights Act now states the same priority as the best interests of the child.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
