In simple terms
A exists where one person, the trustee, holds property for the benefit of another, the , or for a purpose the law allows. The trustee owns the property at law but must use it for the beneficiaries.
A definition
Article 2 of the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts describes a trust as the legal relationship created, during life or on death, by a person called the , when assets have been placed under the control of a trustee for the benefit of a beneficiary or for a specified purpose. It is a good working definition. The assets are a separate fund, not part of the trustee's own estate. Title stands in the trustee's name. The trustee must manage the assets according to the trust and the law, and he is accountable for doing so.
Three essentials
A trust needs three things.
Specific property: a trust can only exist over identified property. In Westdeutsche Landesbank v Islington, Lord Browne-Wilkinson said there must be identifiable trust property. A trust cannot be made over future property, such as what you hope to inherit. In Re Goldcorp Exchange, customers who bought unallocated gold had no trust, because no particular gold could be identified as theirs. They were only unsecured creditors.
A trustee with mandatory duties: the trustee must apply the property as the trust says. Breaking the trust does not mean the trustee lacked the power to act. It makes him personally liable for breach.
Beneficiaries who can enforce it: except for charitable trusts and a few odd purpose trusts, a trust must be for persons, who can go to court to enforce it. A trust to promote good journalism, as a private trust, fails because no one can enforce it.
The trust fund
Trust property is often a changing fund. Trustees sell and reinvest. What they buy with trust money is trust property. Income and other products of trust property, such as dividends, are trust property too. So is any unauthorised profit a trustee makes from his position.
Classifying trusts
By how they arise: express trusts are created on purpose. Resulting trusts arise from the presumed or implied intention of the owner. Constructive trusts are imposed by law because of the trustee's unconscionable conduct.
By the beneficiaries' rights: in a fixed trust the shares are set by the settlor. In a the trustees decide who in a class gets what. A discretionary trust can be exhaustive, where the trustees must distribute everything, or non-exhaustive.
Protective trusts: a protective trust gives a beneficiary a life interest that ends if he tries to dispose of it or goes bankrupt. A discretionary trust for the beneficiary and his family then takes over. It protects a spendthrift. In England the standard form is set out in section 33 of the Trustee Act 1925.
Bare trusts: the trustee has no duties except to hold the property for an adult beneficiary who is absolutely entitled and to obey his directions.
Charitable trusts: trusts for public purposes that the law counts as charitable. They are explained in their own chapter.
Trusts and powers
A lets a person, the donee, choose who gets property, but does not oblige him to choose. That is the key difference from a trust, which is mandatory. A bare or mere power, held personally, need never be exercised, and objects cannot complain if it is not. A power, held by trustees, must at least be considered from time to time.
Powers can be general, where the donee can appoint to anyone, including himself; special, where he can appoint only within a class, such as the settlor's children; or hybrid, where he can appoint to anyone except a class. McPhail v Doulton is the leading case on telling a discretionary trust from a power and on the test for certainty of objects.
Beneficiaries' rights
Beneficiaries can make trustees carry out the trust, even if they gave nothing for it. Under the , adult beneficiaries of sound mind who between them are entitled to the whole beneficial interest can end the trust and call for the property. They cannot, without ending the trust, tell the trustees how to exercise their discretions.
Words and Latin in this note
- Rule in Saunders v Vautier
- Adult beneficiaries of sound mind who together are entitled to the whole beneficial interest can end the trust and call for the property.
- Power of appointment
- A power to choose who receives property. Unlike a trust, a mere power need never be exercised.
- Discretionary trust
- A trust under which the trustees choose which members of a class benefit and by how much. The test of certainty is whether any given person is or is not in the class.
- Beneficiary
- A person entitled to the benefit of trust property in equity, who can make the trustees carry out the trust.
- Fiduciary
- A person, such as a trustee, director or agent, who must act loyally for another. He must not profit from his position or put himself in a conflict of interest. Open the note.
- Settlor
- The person who creates an express trust by declaring himself trustee or transferring property to trustees. Open the note.
- Trust
- An arrangement in which a trustee holds property at law but must use it for beneficiaries, or for a charitable purpose. The beneficiaries have the equitable interest.
Memory map
What a trust is
Three essentials
- Specific property
- A trustee with mandatory duties
- Beneficiaries who can enforce it
Classifying trusts
- By how they arise
- By the beneficiaries' rights
- Protective trusts
- Bare trusts
Key points
- A trust needs specific property, a trustee…
- Express trusts are deliberate
- A trust is mandatory
- Under Saunders v Vautier, adult beneficiaries…
Cases
- Westdeutsche Landesbank…
- Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd
- McPhail v Doulton
- Saunders v Vautier
Key terms
- Trust
- Settlor
- Beneficiary
- Fiduciary
Take-home points
- A trust needs specific property, a trustee bound by mandatory duties, and beneficiaries who can enforce them.
- Express trusts are deliberate. Resulting trusts follow presumed intention. Constructive trusts are imposed by law.
- A trust is mandatory. A power is discretionary. A mere power need never be exercised.
- Under Saunders v Vautier, adult beneficiaries entitled to everything can end the trust and take the property.
Cases in this topic
- Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC
- Re Goldcorp Exchange Ltd
- McPhail v Doulton
- Saunders v Vautier
Related case law
Full judgments on Lanbuk on the same areas of law.
See also
- McPhail v Doulton · Lanbuk on the Law of Equity and Trusts · [1971] AC 424
Lecture notes on this subject
- Equitable Remedies: Rules, Exceptions and Case Law in the UK and Sierra LeoneEquity and trusts
- Law of Equity and Trusts: Course OutlineEquity and trusts
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Exam preparation
Family law
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law

