
Pennington v Waine
2002 · [2002] EWCA Civ 227
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Ada Crampton signed a share transfer to her nephew, which was given to an agent but never delivered to the nephew or the company. She told the nephew, and he became a director in reliance.
- Issue
- Was the gift complete though she had not done all she could?
- Held
- Yes. The Court of Appeal held it would be unconscionable for her to resile, so the gift took effect in equity.
- Principle
- A gift may be complete in equity where it would be unconscionable for the donor to recall it.
- Why it matters
- It is controversial because unconscionability is a vague test.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
