Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Pennington v Waine

2002 · [2002] EWCA Civ 227

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
Ada Crampton signed a share transfer to her nephew, which was given to an agent but never delivered to the nephew or the company. She told the nephew, and he became a director in reliance.
Issue
Was the gift complete though she had not done all she could?
Held
Yes. The Court of Appeal held it would be unconscionable for her to resile, so the gift took effect in equity.
Principle
A gift may be complete in equity where it would be unconscionable for the donor to recall it.
Why it matters
It is controversial because unconscionability is a vague test.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.