
Grey v IRC
1959 · [1960] AC 1
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Hunter transferred shares to trustees to hold for him. He then orally directed them to hold the shares on trusts for his grandchildren, to avoid stamp duty.
- Issue
- Was the oral direction a disposition of an equitable interest, which needed writing?
- Held
- Yes. The House of Lords held it was a disposition and was void without signed writing. The later written confirmations were liable to stamp duty.
- Principle
- A direction to trustees to hold for someone else is a disposition of a subsisting equitable interest and must be in writing.
- Why it matters
- It explains what counts as a disposition.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
