
Beswick v Beswick
1967 · [1968] AC 58
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Peter Beswick sold his coal business to his nephew in return for a promise to pay a weekly sum to Peter's widow after his death. The nephew paid once and then stopped. The widow sued as administratrix and in her own right.
- Issue
- Could the widow enforce the promise, and was available?
- Held
- She could not sue in her own right, as she was not a party. But as administratrix she could obtain specific performance, because damages to the estate would have been nominal and inadequate.
- Principle
- Specific performance is available where damages would be inadequate, including where they would be only nominal.
- Why it matters
- It shows how equity fills a gap left by the common law remedy.
Words and Latin in this note
- Specific performance
- An order requiring a party to actually carry out what they promised in a contract, instead of only paying damages. Open the note.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
