Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Beswick v Beswick

1967 · [1968] AC 58

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
Peter Beswick sold his coal business to his nephew in return for a promise to pay a weekly sum to Peter's widow after his death. The nephew paid once and then stopped. The widow sued as administratrix and in her own right.
Issue
Could the widow enforce the promise, and was available?
Held
She could not sue in her own right, as she was not a party. But as administratrix she could obtain specific performance, because damages to the estate would have been nominal and inadequate.
Principle
Specific performance is available where damages would be inadequate, including where they would be only nominal.
Why it matters
It shows how equity fills a gap left by the common law remedy.

Words and Latin in this note

Specific performance
An order requiring a party to actually carry out what they promised in a contract, instead of only paying damages. Open the note.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.