
Argyll v Argyll
1967 · [1967] Ch 302
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- After their divorce, the Duke of Argyll planned to publish secrets the Duchess had told him during the marriage. He said her adultery, the ground of the divorce, meant she lacked clean hands.
- Issue
- Did her conduct bar an to protect marital confidences?
- Held
- No. Ungoed-Thomas J held that her adultery was not connected closely enough with the relief she sought. The injunction was granted.
- Principle
- The clean hands maxim applies only to misconduct directly connected with the relief claimed.
- Why it matters
- It marks the limits of the clean hands maxim, and is also a leading case on breach of confidence.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
