In simple terms
Most crimes need a guilty act () and a guilty mind () present at the same time, and in result crimes the act must cause the result. Some statutory offences are strict, needing no proof of mens rea.
Actus reus
Voluntary conduct: The act must be voluntary. Thought alone is never punished.
Omissions: Failure to act is criminal only where there is a legal duty to act, for example from statute, contract, relationship or assumption of care.
Possession and status: Some offences are committed by being in possession of something forbidden.
Mens rea
Intention: Aiming at a result, or foreseeing it as virtually certain.
Recklessness and negligence: Taking an unjustified risk knowingly, or falling far below the standard of a .
Transferred malice: If D aims at A and harms B, the intent transfers. Dogbowu v R (WACA) applied this where a blow aimed at a woman killed the child on her back.
Strict liability
Absolute offences: Some regulatory offences need no mens rea. In Comptroller of Customs v Basma the court looked at the object of the statute and the absence of words like "knowingly" and held the customs offence absolute.
The presumption: Courts still presume mens rea is needed unless the statute clearly or by necessary implication excludes it (Sweet v Parsley).
Causation
Factual and legal cause: D's act must be a cause in fact and a legal cause of the result.
Medical treatment: Poor treatment does not break the chain if the original wound is still an operating and substantial cause. Bangura v R (CA) applied R v Smith [1959] 2 QB 35 on this point.
Concurrence
Coincidence: The guilty mind and guilty act must coincide, although a continuing act or a series of acts may be treated as one.
Words and Latin in this note
- Strict liability
- An offence in which the prosecution need not prove a guilty mind as to one or more elements. The act must still be proved, and it must still be voluntary. The presumption is that mens rea is required, unless the statute or its subject matter displaces it. Open the note.
- Recklessness
- The conscious taking of an unjustified risk. The accused foresaw the possibility of the harm and went on. The older Caldwell test, which treated a person as reckless for giving no thought to an obvious risk, has been discarded. Open the note.
- Actus reus
- The physical part of a crime: the act, the circumstances, and in a result crime the consequence. It does not include the state of mind. It must be voluntary, unless the offence is one of the rare status crimes. Open the note.
- Mens rea
- The mental element in the definition of a crime. It is not one standard. Intention is the highest form. Recklessness is below it. Gross negligence sits at the bottom. The definition of the particular crime decides which is required. Open the note.
Memory map
The elements of a crime
Actus reus
- Voluntary conduct
- Omissions
- Possession and status
Mens rea
- Intention
- Recklessness and negligence
- Transferred malice
Strict liability
- Absolute offences
- The presumption
Key points
- A crime usually needs actus reus plus mens rea…
- Omissions are criminal only where there is a…
- Transferred malice
- Strict liability depends on the object and…
Cases
- Dogbowu v R
- Comptroller of Customs v Basma
- Bangura v R
Key terms
- Actus reus
- Mens rea
- Negligence
- Causation
Take-home points
- A crime usually needs actus reus plus mens rea at the same time.
- Omissions are criminal only where there is a duty to act.
- Transferred malice: Dogbowu v R.
- depends on the object and words of the statute: Comptroller of Customs v Basma.
- A wound that remains an operating and substantial cause keeps the : Bangura v R.
Cases in this topic
Related case law
Full judgments on Lanbuk on the same areas of law.
- Kai-Kai & 13 Others v S (SC CRIM APP 1 of 1988) [1989] SLSC 7 (29 September 1989)Sierra Leone
- Jarrie v R, 1957-60 ALR S.L. 17Sierra Leone
- Cole v S (CR APP 2 of 1975) [1975] SLCA 1 (21 December 1975)Sierra Leone
- Kilbert Turay & Regina (CR APP 23 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1233 (13 November 1963)Sierra Leone
- State v Majawa (Criminal Review Case 2 of 2024) [2024] MWHC 37 (21 July 2024)
See also
- Dogbowu v R, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 232 · Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
- Comptroller of Customs v Basma, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 428 · Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
- Sweet v Parsley · Lanbuk on Criminal Law · AC 132
- Bangura v R · Lanbuk on the Law of Crimes in Sierra Leone · ALR (S.L.) 439 (1964-66), Court of Appeal of Sierra Leone
Lecture notes on this subject
No other Lanbuk notes on this module yet. Browse the law notes.
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Equity and trusts
Exam preparation
Family law
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law

