
Tholly v Reginam
pre-1961 · West African Court of Appeal
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- The put his thumbprint on a payment voucher in the name of the payee and obtained the money.
- Issue
- Was this forgery?
- Held
- Yes. Applying Mead v Young, the document told a lie about who had made it; forgery and uttering were proved.
- Principle
- A document is false if it purports to be made by someone who did not make it.
- Why it matters
- Relevant where thumbprints serve as signatures.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
