
Nash v Inman
1908 · 2 KB 1
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A tailor sued a Cambridge undergraduate for the price of clothes, including eleven fancy waistcoats. The minor was already well supplied with clothes.
- Issue
- Were the clothes necessaries?
- Held
- No. They were not suitable to his actual requirements. The tailor failed.
- Principle
- Necessaries are goods suitable to the minor's station and to their actual needs at the time.
- Why it matters
- Status is not enough. The minor must actually need the goods.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
