
Gardner v Coutts & Co
1967 · 3 All ER 1064
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A seller promised the buyer an option over adjoining land if he ever wished to sell it. He later gave the land to his sister, without offering it.
- Issue
- Did the promise cover a gift as well as a sale?
- Held
- Yes. Cross J implied that term. The seller would have said 'of course' if asked.
- Principle
- A term is implied where it is obvious and necessary to give the promise the business effect both sides must have meant.
- Why it matters
- It is the officious bystander case.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
