
Barry v Heathcote Ball
2000
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Two machines worth about £14,000 each were auctioned without reserve. The only bid was the claimant's £200 each. The auctioneer refused to sell.
- Issue
- Was the auctioneer bound to sell to that bidder?
- Held
- Yes. There was a collateral contract. Damages were £27,600. The Court of Appeal followed Warlow v Harrison.
- Principle
- An auctioneer who sells without reserve promises to sell to the highest bidder.
- Why it matters
- It turns the dicta in Warlow into a holding a student can cite.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
