Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Barry v Heathcote Ball

2000

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
Two machines worth about £14,000 each were auctioned without reserve. The only bid was the claimant's £200 each. The auctioneer refused to sell.
Issue
Was the auctioneer bound to sell to that bidder?
Held
Yes. There was a collateral contract. Damages were £27,600. The Court of Appeal followed Warlow v Harrison.
Principle
An auctioneer who sells without reserve promises to sell to the highest bidder.
Why it matters
It turns the dicta in Warlow into a holding a student can cite.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.