
Balfour v Balfour
1919 · 2 KB 571
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A husband working abroad promised his wife an allowance. They were still living as a married couple when the promise was made. She later sued on it.
- Issue
- Did they intend a legally binding contract?
- Held
- No. Domestic arrangements are presumed not to create legal relations.
- Principle
- A family promise, made while the household is intact, is not a contract unless the contrary is shown.
- Why it matters
- It is the starting presumption for domestic agreements.
Also on Lanbuk
- Balfour v Balfour in Lanbuk on the Law of the Family
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
