
Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass
1971 · [1972] AC 153
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A store manager failed to check that goods were correctly priced, so goods were sold above the advertised price. Tesco relied on the defence that the offence was due to the act or default of another person and that it had taken reasonable precautions.
- Issue
- Was the store manager part of Tesco's directing mind?
- Held
- No. He was 'another person'. Tesco's board had set up a proper system, so the defence succeeded.
- Principle
- Only those who represent the directing mind of the company, usually the board and senior managers, are identified with it.
- Why it matters
- It limits criminal liability of large companies under the identification doctrine.
Also on Lanbuk
- Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass in Lanbuk on Criminal Law
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
