Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver

1942 · [1942] UKHL 1, [1967] 2 AC 134n

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts
Regal wanted to take leases of two cinemas through a subsidiary. The landlord required the subsidiary's capital to be fully subscribed. Regal could not afford all the shares, so the directors bought some themselves and later sold at a profit.
Issue
Were the directors liable to account for their profit?
Held
Yes. They obtained the shares by reason of their position and in the course of their office. They had to account, though they acted in good faith and the company could not have bought the shares.
Principle
Directors must account for profits made from their position unless the company consents.
Why it matters
It is the leading case on the no-profit rule.

For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.