
Lloyd v Grace, Smith and Co
1912 · [1912] AC 716
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- A solicitors' managing clerk induced a client to transfer property to him and then dishonestly disposed of it for his own benefit.
- Issue
- Was the firm liable for its clerk's fraud, though it did not benefit?
- Held
- Yes. The clerk acted within the scope of his authority, so the firm was liable.
- Principle
- A principal is liable for an agent's fraud within the scope of his employment, even if done for the agent's own benefit.
- Why it matters
- It applies to companies as employers.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
