
Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley
1972 · [1972] 1 WLR 443
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Cooley, managing director of IDC, was offered a contract by a gas board that would not deal with IDC. He left IDC by pretending to be ill and took the contract himself.
- Issue
- Was Cooley liable to account for the profits?
- Held
- Yes. The information came to him as managing director, and he had a duty to pass it on. He had to account even though IDC might not have obtained the contract.
- Principle
- A director must not divert to himself an opportunity that came to him in his capacity as director.
- Why it matters
- It applies the no-conflict rule to corporate opportunities.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
